Infinity Goes Hostile: Set Theory Leverages Into Computer Science, Bullies Algorithms
1/6/2026, 8:01:38 AM
Listen up, deal junkies. What I’m about to tell you will rip the pinstripe pants right off your logical underpants. Forget mergers and acquisitions. Forget leveraged buyouts. There’s a bigger, badder, richer frontier: infinity. And this week, some Oxford-shirted mathematical nutjob built a bridge between the forbidden forest of set theory (the kind of abandon-all-hope zone no sane Wall Street wolf ever treads) and the glitzy casino floor of computer science. That’s right: the purest theoretical math has been squeezed into a little black number and ushered into Gordon’s favorite place — the market!
Picture the elite: mathematicians so freakishly obsessed with infinity, they make Warren Buffett look like a coupon clipper. These are the descriptive set theorists. They don’t quit infinity when the market closes; they vacation in it. Meanwhile, across the floor, we’ve got computer scientists. These guys worship algorithms, mainline finite logic, and wouldn’t recognize infinity if it maxed out their RAM.
Enter Anton Bernshteyn — the Michael Milken of the math world, minus the jail time and a little more infinity. He just built an intellectual bridge that makes the Golden Gate look like a children’s toy. Suddenly, problems about sets with *no end* are being thrown on boardroom tables next to network charts and packet-sending servers. For a moment, the infinite and the finite met in a smoky Manhattan steakhouse, stared each other down, and said, “You complete me.”
This is not supposed to happen, folks. The underlying deal structure of mathematics was always: you keep your infinite abstractions, we’ll keep our practical tech — and nobody gets hurt. But Anton threw out the NDA. Now sets that can’t be counted can be moved around and optimized like equities on a trading desk. Windows have been blown out. The quants are running in circles. I saw Alan Turing’s ghost at 21 Club screaming about Banach-Tarski splits over his third martini.
And it gets better. Half the set theorists are now moonlighting as computer nerds, and the computer nerds are quoting Cantor at hackathons like it’s 1988 and everyone’s high on junk bonds. This is synergy so pure it would make Sun Tzu weep into his options grant.
A decade ago, if you talked about descriptive set theory at happy hour, you’d get tossed out faster than an index fund at a stock-picking convention. Now, you drop “uncountable” at a TechCrunch mixer and all the VCs want your number. The party has moved to infinity, baby.
The real takeaway? The walls have come down. If the wild-eyed infinity people and the caffeine-fueled algorithm squad can fuse their arts, what’s next? Honestly, I’m buying calls on paradoxes and going long on Zermelo-Fraenkel. Maybe the next great financial instrument is just a measure-theory swap away.
And all because one man didn’t read the fine print on reality. Now infinity is everybody’s business. Gordon out.
